Peer Review Process
Double-anonymized · Rigorous · Transparent
Our Editorial Workflow
Every manuscript undergoes an independent editorial and peer review process designed to support scholarly quality, research integrity and responsible academic publishing
Technical Evaluation & Initial Screening
Submissions undergo an initial technical assessment to evaluate manuscript completeness, formatting, journal scope alignment and general submission requirements. Editorial checks may also include originality assessment and ethical compliance review where applicable
Manuscripts requiring technical corrections may be returned to authors prior to peer review. All submitted materials are handled confidentially throughout the editorial process
Initial screening Formatting assessment Confidential handlingEditorial Assessment
The editorial team evaluates submissions for relevance, academic quality, originality and alignment with the journal's scope and publishing standards
Suitable manuscripts proceed to editorial coordination and reviewer selection. Submissions considered outside the journal scope or below editorial requirements may not advance to external review
Scope evaluation Editorial assessment Reviewer coordinationDouble-Blind Peer Review
Research manuscripts undergo independent double-blind peer review conducted by qualified subject specialists. Author and reviewer identities remain confidential throughout the evaluation process to support fair and objective review
Reviewers assess research quality, clarity, methodology, originality, scholarly relevance and ethical considerations. Reviewers are expected to disclose any potential conflicts of interest prior to participating in the review process
Double-blind review Independent expert evaluation Confidential review processRevision & Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer and editorial feedback, authors may be invited to submit revised manuscripts addressing comments and recommendations. Revised submissions may undergo additional editorial assessment or further peer review where necessary
Editorial decisions are based on reviewer evaluations, scholarly merit, editorial standards and the overall suitability of the manuscript for publication
Revision process Editorial communication Constructive feedbackFinal Decision & Publication Workflow
Following completion of peer review and editorial evaluation, authors receive the final editorial decision together with reviewer feedback where applicable
Accepted manuscripts proceed through editorial preparation, formatting, proofing and publication workflows before online publication through the journal's open-access platform
Final editorial decision Publication preparation Open-access dissemination
Quality Assurance at Every Step
Epistora Publications supports responsible scholarly communication through transparent editorial practices and research-focused publication standards
Originality & Ethical Review
Submissions may undergo originality assessment and ethical screening as part of the editorial evaluation process
Editorial Integrity
Editorial and peer review activities are conducted with an emphasis on fairness, confidentiality, research integrity, and responsible scholarly evaluation
Transparent Communication
Authors are informed throughout the editorial and peer review process regarding manuscript progress, revision requirements and editorial decisions
Confidentiality & Data Protection
Editorial communications, reviewer activities and manuscript materials are handled confidentially in accordance with responsible publishing practices
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Editors, reviewers and authors are encouraged to disclose any potential conflicts that could influence the editorial or research process
Long-Term Accessibility
Published research is maintained through preservation-focused digital publishing practices designed to support long-term scholarly accessibility
Ready to Submit Your Work?
Epistora Publications welcomes research contributions from scholars, researchers and institutions committed to advancing accessible and responsible scholarly communication across the global academic community